AI Agent Security Services
Kernel-level AI agent hardening for NemoClaw and OpenClaw deployments. Landlock, seccomp, network namespace isolation — the stack that survived ClawHavoc.
Your Agent Has Root Access Right Now. Do You Know What It's Doing?
February 2026: ClawHavoc exposed 1,184 malicious skills in the ClawHub marketplace — credential exfiltration, reverse shells, context forwarding to third-party endpoints. Every unprotected deployment was compromised by default. Most operators didn't know for weeks. We knew in hours — because we'd already built the containment layer that made it visible. If your OpenClaw deployment doesn't have kernel-level isolation, you're not running AI agents. You're running liabilities.
What You Get
Every engagement starts with your current deployment and ends with a system that’s auditable, isolated at the kernel, and provably under your control. Not “we configured some settings.” Provably. YAML policies you can read. Kernel boundaries you can verify with cat /proc/self/attr/. Cryptographic logs that prove what ran, when, and what it touched.
The Security Stack — What’s Actually Running
Run-as: sandbox:sandbox (non-root, always)
Filesystem: /usr, /lib, /etc → read-only | /sandbox, /tmp → read-write
Network: Deny-all default + explicit allowlist per skill
Policies: YAML-defined, version-controlled, hash-audited
Models: Nemotron local (private) + cloud fallback (explicit opt-in)
Partners: NVIDIA, Cisco AI Defense, CrowdStrike, Trend Micro
Why Containment Beats Detection — Every Time
ClawHub added VirusTotal scanning after the breach. That catches known signatures. It does not catch a skill that calls a legitimate API in an unauthorized context. It does not catch novel exfiltration techniques. It cannot evaluate intent.
Here’s the first-principles question: if a skill can reach your host filesystem, open arbitrary network connections, and spawn processes — does it matter whether you scanned it first? The answer is no. The only architecture that holds is isolation: if the blast radius is zero, the intent doesn’t matter. Landlock, seccomp, and network namespaces enforce at the kernel. No skill code can bypass them. No prompt injection can escalate past them. That’s what we deploy.
Service Tiers
- OpenClaw installation and hardening
- 1 communication channel configured
- 5 curated, security-vetted skills
- Basic OpenShell policy template
- Setup documentation and runbook
- 30-day post-setup support
- Everything in Starter, plus:
- Full NemoClaw/OpenShell deployment
- Local model setup (Nemotron-3-Nano-4B)
- 3 communication channels
- 10 curated skills with custom policies
- Tiered inference routing (local + cloud)
- 60-day post-setup support
- Everything in Pro, plus:
- Full security audit of existing deployment
- Custom skill development
- Secure tunnel configuration
- Comprehensive documentation package
- Team training session (90 min)
- 90-day priority support
Ongoing Security Retainers
Deploying is step one. The threat surface keeps expanding — new skills published daily, new attack vectors discovered weekly. Deployments that aren’t actively maintained aren’t secure; they’re decaying. Our retainers include monthly security scans, skill vetting, policy tuning, and priority response. Think of it as compounding security: every month your posture gets stronger instead of weaker.
Why ClawBastion — Not Another Setup Guide
Most NemoClaw “services” are documentation walkthroughs with a Calendly link. They install, they configure, they leave. Then ClawHavoc happens and you’re on your own.
We run this stack on our own hardware, in production, protecting real client data. We filed the first upstream bug fix on OpenShell (Issue #481 — missing binaries field in presets). We wrote Policy v7 from scratch when the defaults were laughably permissive. When we harden your deployment, we’re applying policies we’d bet our own infrastructure on — because we already do.
We were building on the OpenClaw ecosystem before NemoClaw was announced at GTC 2026. The policies we write reflect judgment that comes from building in the ecosystem when the docs were sparse, the bugs were frequent, and the security model was still being figured out. There is no substitute for that timeline.
Founder client slots are limited. The clients we take now work directly with Jordi — architecture, deployment, policy review, all of it. No handoffs. No junior engineers. That changes as the roster grows. If you want the direct access, the window is now.
Security Clients Who Also Need Web Presence
AI security and web presence aren't mutually exclusive. The same engineering discipline applies to both. DFW businesses that need both get the same founders, the same standard, across both tracks.